NGOs from Korea and Indonesia file OECD complaint against POSCO International for causing palm oil abuses and National Pension Service and the Export-Import Bank of Korea for financing the abuses
Seoul, December 12, 2019 – Today Korean Transnational Corporations Watch (KTNC Watch), Yayasan Pusaka (Indonesia), WALHI Papua (Indonesia), and SKP KAMe (Indonesia), filed a complaint at Korea’s National Contact Point (NCP) for the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) against POSCO International and two Korean public financial institutions, the Korean National Pension Service (NPS) and the Export-Import Bank of Korea (KEXIM).
The complaint concerns POSCO International, the controlling owner, and the NPS and KEXIM, the financers of POSCO International. The complaint is related to the adverse impacts caused by the operation of the palm oil company PT. Bio Inti Agrindo (PT. BIA), a subsidiary of POSCO International in Papua, Indonesia. The adverse impacts include large-scale deforestation of tropical rainforest and loss of biodiversity; failure to implement Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) with the customary owners of the land in the process of developing the plantation; and violation of local residents’ right to water by degrading the Bian River water quality.
The complaint is supported by evidence of misconduct by PT. BIA, which is owned by POSCO International. POSCO International has not addressed the deforestation carried out by PT. BIA or put in place policies to prevent further deforestation. Allegations were repeatedly made in regard to violation of the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), but POSCO International failed to provide a proper remedy to stakeholders. Due to the degradation of the water quality of the Bian River, local residents can no longer use the water from the river for their daily activities or drinking. However, no measures were taken to ensure that the right to water of the local residents is protected.
Under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (the Guidelines hereinafter), corporations have a duty to respect human rights and address adverse impacts when they occur. Corporations should avoid causing the adverse impacts and should provide remedies when the adverse impacts occur. However, measures taken by POSCO International serve as neither remedies for the harms occurred nor due diligence policies to prevent or mitigate further adverse impacts.
Meanwhile, the Guidelines require the corporations to seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts directly linked to financial services by a business relationship. NPS, as an institutional shareholder of POSCO International, should engage with the investee companies damaging shareholder value, but NPS has failed to meaningfully engage with POSCO International despite its awareness on the adverse impacts. KEXIM also failed to review the reasonably foreseeable risk in the palm oil industry when it decided to provide the loans to POSCO International’s subsidiary in Papua.
The Norwegian Government Pension Fund and the Dutch pension fund ABP have divested from POSCO International on the grounds of deforestation, and the Korean media has covered the relevant issues in relation to PT. BIA’s operation. Despite this the NPS continues to hold a more than five percent share in POSCO International, and KEXIM has provided loans for PT. BIA’s operations.
Y.L. Franky, the Director of Yayasan Pusaka stated, “The palm oil industry creates many difficulties for the indigenous people of Papua. The forest they have depended on is disappearing and social conflicts due to land disputes are on the increase.” Pastor Anselmus Amo, the Director of SKP KAMe reiterated that the local residents have suffered since PT. BIA began operating the plantation and further explained, “Daily life has been made particularly difficult for local residents by the now polluted river water. However, local residents do not know where to go to raise these issues.” Shin Young Chung, KTNC Watch lawyer also pointed out, “Well-known pension funds have withdrawn their investments, and public financial institutions in Korea should also adopt policies to consider environmental and social impacts of the business.” She hopes the NCP will make a decision that will bring actual change to the behaviour of POSCO International and the financers.
The complainants request that the Korean NCP facilitate dialogue to persuade POSCO International to acknowledge the deforestation they have caused and provide the remediation. They also call on POSCO International to adopt and publish a comprehensive group-wide cross-commodity No Deforestation, No Peat, and No Exploitation (NDPE) policy to prevent further damages. It is also requested that POSCO International implement FPIC in their operation and ensure the right to water of the local communities relying on the Bian River.
They also request that the NPS engage with POSCO International to use their leverage and consider deforestation and infringement of the rights of indigenous people in their policies for socially responsible investment. The complainants request KEXIM to adopt policies for reviewing environmental and social risks in developing natural resources overseas and refrain from providing further loans to support PT. BIA’s operations that are causing adverse impacts.
Various other NGOs, such as WALHI Kalimantan Tengah (Friends of the Earth Indonesia), Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), Friends of the Earth Melbourne, Friends of Earth U.S. support the filing of this complaint against POSCO International, NPS and KEXIM by KTNC Watch, Yayasan Pusaka, SKP KAMe and WALHI Papua.
Note for editors
For more information or interview requests you can contact:
KTNC Watch: Shin Young Chung (Attorney-at-Law), [email protected], +82-2-3478-0529
Yayasan Pusaka: Franky Samperante (Director), [email protected], +62-21 -7892137
SKP KAMe: Father Anselmo Amo (Director), [email protected]
WALHI Papua: Aiesh Rumbekwan (Executive Director), [email protected], +62 813 4452 4394
※You can download the full report here
ⓒSave our seas foundation[/caption]
해양보호구역 지정과 관리에 의한 해양 생물의 증가는 바다를 통해 경제 생활을 하는 인간 활동과 식량 문제에 긍정적 영향을 주고 있습니다. 해양 생태계의 생물다양성은 우리의 삶과도 직접적인 연관 관계에 있는것이죠.
인간 간섭이 없는 해양보호구역은 서식지를 보호함으로 어린물고기가 성장하는데 도움을 줍니다. 해양보호구역은 영향을 쉽게 받는 생태계와 멸종위기종을 보호하기도 합니다. 우리나라 뿐 아니라 많은 나라에 서식하고 있는 산호는 인간 간섭으로 인해 백화되어 사라지고 있는데요. 인간 간섭이 없는 해양보호구역으로 백화된 산호를 복구할수 있다고 합니다.
안타깝게도 우리나라엔 고래상어와 홍상귀상어만 멸종위기종으로 지정돼 있습니다. 하지만 많은 국가에서 상어와 가오리류를 멸종위기종으로 지정해 보호하고 있지요. 상어와 가오리와 같은 멸종위기종을 포함해 다양한 해양생물의 성장을 보장할 수 있는 방법은 인간 간섭이 없는 해양보호구역의 지정과 관리입니다.
결국 생물 다양성이 보장된 건강한 바다는 ▲일자리와 식량 ▲다양한 경제 활동이라는 혜택으로 인가에게 돌아옵니다.
인간의 웰빙과 생존과 연결된 바다지만, 그 전에 ‘생명과 자연이 조화를 이룬 생태계를 보전하는 건 너무 당연한게 아닐까?’라는 생각을 해봅니다.
일본 정부의 방사능 방류에 대해 윤석열 정부의 대책을 요구하는 퍼포먼스 ⓒ환경운동연합[/caption]
한-일 정상이 후쿠시마 오염수에 오염된 물고기들을 주고받는 퍼포먼스 ⓒ환경운동연합[/caption]
[caption id="attachment_230456" align="aligncenter" width="640"]
후쿠시마 오염수에 오염된 물고기들 ⓒ환경운동연합[/caption]
더구나 우리는 일본 정부에, 해양 생태계와 시민들의 먹거리 안전을 지킬 수 있는 분명한 해법을 제시할 수도 있다. 오염수를 해양에 투기하는 것이 아닌, 지상에 장기 보관하는 방식이 있기 때문이다. 환경 보전의 측면과 국민 안전의 측면에서 윤석열 대통령은 좌고우면하지 말고 단호한 태도로 일본에 장기 보관 해법을 제시해야 한다.
나아가 후쿠시마산 수산물 수입 규제 조치 유지 입장을 공언함으로써, 일본의 오염수 배출 임박으로 불안이 극에 달한 시민들에게 국가가 보장할 수 있는 최소한의 먹거리 안전망을 포기하지 않을 것임을 대통령으로서 천명하길 바란다.
시민들의 의견
댓글 달기