주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처, 2020.12)

지역

기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처, 2020.12)

admin | 화, 2021/01/12- 19:36


기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처).pdf
6.21MB

[요   약]

 
     우리나라의 도시는 여름철에 강우가 집중되는 기후적 특성과 함께 인구가
밀집되고 다수의 주요 시설이 설치되어 홍수에 취약한 여건을 가지고 있다.
더불어 최근에는 기후변화의 영향으로 홍수방어시설의 능력을 초과하는 이상
강우(異常降雨)의 발생이 증가하여, 도시에서의 인명 및 재산피해가 늘어나고
있다. 특히 2020년 여름의 역대 최장기간 장마와 집중호우는 우리가 예측하기
힘든 규모의 홍수가 지속적으로 발생할 수 있음을 의미하며, 향후 선제적인
홍수예방 대책과 홍수발생 시 피해를 최소화하기 위한 체계적인 대응방안의
중요성을 시사하고 있다.
     이에 이 보고서에서는 국가 홍수대책 가운데 도시홍수에 대한 관리 현황
을 살펴보고, 가속화되는 기후변화에 대응하기 위한 방안을 모색하였다. 국내·
외 도시홍수 사례, 법체계 및 관련 사업 등을 조사하였으며, 현행 도시홍수의
예방 및 대응체계를 검토하여 다음과 같은 입법 및 정책 개선방안을 제시하였
다.
     첫째, 다수의 부처에서 추진하는 도시홍수 관련 사업 간의 연계성을 강화
할 필요가 있다. 「수자원의 조사·계획 및 관리에 관한 법률」 제20조에 따라
수립되는 ‘특정하천유역치수계획’의 대상 범위를 입법취지에 맞게 변경하고,
의무적·정기적으로 계획을 수립하며, 사업완료 후에는 사후관리를 실시하는 등
미비점을 정비하는 방안을 고려할 수 있다.
     둘째, 저영향개발(LID, Low Impact Development) 기법과 같은 비구조적
대책을 적극 활용하여 도시의 왜곡된 물순환 체계를 개선해야 한다. 도시지역
에서 일정 규모 이상의 개발사업을 시행할 경우에는 녹지 조성을 통해 빗물의
침투를 활성화하고, 물 재이용시설을 설치하며, 도시하천을 자연형 하천으로
정비하는 등 저영향개발 기법을 고려하도록 규정할 필요가 있다.

     셋째, 기후변화에 적절히 대응하기 위한 도시홍수 방어능력을 구축해야
한다. 도시홍수 예방을 위한 다양한 방재시설의 규모, 중요도와 함께 기후 및
지형요건 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 설계기준을 수립·운영하고, 설계기준의 적
정성을 정기적으로 검토할 필요가 있다. 더불어 기존의 대하천 중심의 홍수관
리에서 벗어나 홍수피해가 주로 발생하는 중·소규모 하천에 대한 정비를 확충
해야 한다.
     넷째, 홍수발생 시 피해를 최소화하기 위한 도시홍수 대응 시스템을 체계
적으로 구축할 필요가 있다. 수위·유량 관측소를 확충하여 도시하천 유역 전
반에 대한 실시간 예·경보 체계의 정확도를 향상시켜야 한다. 침수흔적도 및
홍수위험지도 등 홍수범람위험도를 체계적으로 구축하고, 이를 기반으로 홍수
위험 지역에 위치한 다중이용시설의 관리를 강화해야 한다. 더불어 단시간에
발생하는 도시홍수의 피해를 최소화하기 위한 신속한 피난체계를 구축하고,
교육, 훈련 및 홍보를 지속적으로 실시할 필요가 있다.

 

[목   차] 

Ⅰ. 서론 / 1
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ··············································································· 1
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 ··············································································· 3
가. 연구의 범위 ························································································ 3
나. 연구의 방법 ························································································ 4
Ⅱ. 도시홍수 관련 현황 / 5
1. 개요 ········································································································· 5
가. 도시홍수의 원인 ················································································· 5
나. 도시홍수 발생 현황 ··········································································· 6
2. 법령 현황 ······························································································· 11
가. 부처별 소관 업무 및 법령 현황 ······················································ 11
나. 입법 연혁 ························································································· 23
Ⅲ. 도시홍수 예방대책의 문제점 / 28
1. 부처별 대책 간의 연계성 부족 ····························································· 28
2. 도시지역 개발로 인한 불투수면 증가 ·················································· 30
3. 도시홍수 예방시설의 효용성 부족 ························································ 32
4. 도시홍수 대응 시스템 미비 ·································································· 34

Ⅳ. 해외 사례 / 37
1. 중국 ········································································································ 37
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 37
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 39
2. 일본 ········································································································ 41
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 41
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 43
3. 유럽 ········································································································ 45
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 45
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 46
4. 시사점 ···································································································· 48
Ⅴ. 입법 및 정책 개선 방안 / 49
1. 특정하천유역치수계획의 정비 ······························································· 49
2. 도시물순환 체계 개선 ··········································································· 51
3. 도시홍수 방어능력 구축 ········································································ 53
4. 도시홍수 대응 시스템 선진화 ······························································· 55
Ⅵ. 결론 / 57
참고문헌 / 61
부록 / 63
[부록 1] 특정도시하천유역 침수피해방지대책법(안) ······························· 63

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문


D20074232019년도 지방공기업 결산결과 발표.hwp
0.21MB

 

 

 

보 도 자 료

작성과

공기업지원과

 

2020731() 조간

(7. 30. 12:00 이후)부터
보도하여 주시기 바랍니다.

담당자

과 장 이준식

주무관 이재호

연락처

044-205-3981

044-205-3988

 

2019년도 지방공기업 결산결과 발표

 

- 부채비율 지난해에 비해 2.9%p 감소 점진적 개선 -

 

정안전부(장관 진영)는 지방공사 66, 공단 85, 하수도 등 직영기업 254 405개 지방공기업에 대한 2019년 결산 결과를 발표했다.

 

2019 사업연도 지방공기업 자산205조 원, 부채 52.5조 원(부채비율 34.4%), 자본152조 원으로 나타났다.

 

증감현을 살펴보면 전년 대비 자산11.5조 원이 증가하였고, 부채 661억 원 감소, 자본11.6조 원이 증가하여 부채비율2.9%p 감소한 것으로 나타났다.

<주요 지표 전년 대비 증감 현황>

(단위: 조원)

 

최근 5년간 자산, 자본은 지속적으로 증가한 반면, 부채는 꾸준히 감소하고 있다.

<최근 5년 동안 지방공기업 재무현황>

(단위: 조원)

연도

구분

2015

2016

2017

2018(a)

2019(b)

증감

(c=b-a)

증감률

(c/a)

자산

182.9

185.9

177.9

193.4

204.9

11.5

5.9%

부채

72.2

68.1

52.3

52.5

52.5

0.07

0.1%

 

부채비율(%)

65.2%

57.9%

41.6%

37.3%

34.4%

2.9%p

 

자본

110.7

117.8

125.6

140.8

152.4

11.6

8.2%

 

수, 2020/08/05- 05:06
0
0


환경정의 관점에서 제천시 자원관리센터 사례 분석.pdf
0.34MB

오늘날 혐오시설을 대하는 분위기가 이전과는 달라진 상황이다. 주민들의 참여나 정보공개 없
이 독단적으로 사업을 추진할 수 없고 혐오시설이지만 반드시 입지해야 할 필요성이 있을 때에는
추진 전부터 그에 걸맞은 접근을 하고 있기 때문이다. 즉, 부담과 이득의 공정한 처우(fair
treatment), 의미있는 참여(meaningful involvement)가 강조되고 있다.
이에 따라 본 연구는 제천시 자원관리센터의 입지선정 과정부터 현재까지의 상황에 대해 환경
정의 이론을 적용하여 분석하였다. 연구를 통해 첫째, 제천시는 사업시작 전부터 관련 방안들을
제시하여 환경적 부담과 이익의 형평한 분배가 이루어질 수 있도록 유도하였음을 알 수 있었다.
둘째, 사업 준비부터 준공까지 전 차원・전 과정에 주민들의 참여를 유도하고, 책임전담팀을 구성
하여 이들이 책임지고 사업을 추진해가도록 도모하였으며, 모든 정보를 공개・공유함으로 투명성
확보 및 정보비대칭 문제를 해소하였다. 이에 절차적 정의가 실현될 수 있었다. 셋째, 자원관리센
터 준공 이후에도 다양한 노력들을 시행하여 시 차원에는 예산절감 효과를, 환경측면에는 환경오

염을 줄여 실질적 정의를 실현시켰음을 알 수 있었다. 이는 환경부하의 감소는 물론 자원이 순환
되게 만들어 생태적 정의 달성에도 영향을 주었다.
결국 환경정의 네 가지 요인은 상호 연결되어 있음을 알 수 있었고, 정부가 공정한 처우, 의미
있는 참여를 바탕으로 주민들을 설득한다면 혐오시설이라 할지라도 주민들의 저항없이 입지할 수
있음을 알 수 있었다.

화, 2020/08/11- 22:43
0
0

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅰ] 2019회계연도 결산 총괄분석 (국회예산정책처)

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅱ] 2019회계연도 결산 위원회별 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

 

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅲ] 2019회계연도 공공기관 결산 분석 보고서

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅳ] 2018회계연도 결산 국회 시정요구사항에 대한 정부 조치결과 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 V] 2019회계연도 성인지 결산서 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

 

화, 2020/08/11- 23:24
0
0