주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처, 2020.12)

지역

기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처, 2020.12)

admin | 화, 2021/01/12- 19:36


기후변화 대응 도시홍수 대책 (국회입법조사처).pdf
6.21MB

[요   약]

 
     우리나라의 도시는 여름철에 강우가 집중되는 기후적 특성과 함께 인구가
밀집되고 다수의 주요 시설이 설치되어 홍수에 취약한 여건을 가지고 있다.
더불어 최근에는 기후변화의 영향으로 홍수방어시설의 능력을 초과하는 이상
강우(異常降雨)의 발생이 증가하여, 도시에서의 인명 및 재산피해가 늘어나고
있다. 특히 2020년 여름의 역대 최장기간 장마와 집중호우는 우리가 예측하기
힘든 규모의 홍수가 지속적으로 발생할 수 있음을 의미하며, 향후 선제적인
홍수예방 대책과 홍수발생 시 피해를 최소화하기 위한 체계적인 대응방안의
중요성을 시사하고 있다.
     이에 이 보고서에서는 국가 홍수대책 가운데 도시홍수에 대한 관리 현황
을 살펴보고, 가속화되는 기후변화에 대응하기 위한 방안을 모색하였다. 국내·
외 도시홍수 사례, 법체계 및 관련 사업 등을 조사하였으며, 현행 도시홍수의
예방 및 대응체계를 검토하여 다음과 같은 입법 및 정책 개선방안을 제시하였
다.
     첫째, 다수의 부처에서 추진하는 도시홍수 관련 사업 간의 연계성을 강화
할 필요가 있다. 「수자원의 조사·계획 및 관리에 관한 법률」 제20조에 따라
수립되는 ‘특정하천유역치수계획’의 대상 범위를 입법취지에 맞게 변경하고,
의무적·정기적으로 계획을 수립하며, 사업완료 후에는 사후관리를 실시하는 등
미비점을 정비하는 방안을 고려할 수 있다.
     둘째, 저영향개발(LID, Low Impact Development) 기법과 같은 비구조적
대책을 적극 활용하여 도시의 왜곡된 물순환 체계를 개선해야 한다. 도시지역
에서 일정 규모 이상의 개발사업을 시행할 경우에는 녹지 조성을 통해 빗물의
침투를 활성화하고, 물 재이용시설을 설치하며, 도시하천을 자연형 하천으로
정비하는 등 저영향개발 기법을 고려하도록 규정할 필요가 있다.

     셋째, 기후변화에 적절히 대응하기 위한 도시홍수 방어능력을 구축해야
한다. 도시홍수 예방을 위한 다양한 방재시설의 규모, 중요도와 함께 기후 및
지형요건 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 설계기준을 수립·운영하고, 설계기준의 적
정성을 정기적으로 검토할 필요가 있다. 더불어 기존의 대하천 중심의 홍수관
리에서 벗어나 홍수피해가 주로 발생하는 중·소규모 하천에 대한 정비를 확충
해야 한다.
     넷째, 홍수발생 시 피해를 최소화하기 위한 도시홍수 대응 시스템을 체계
적으로 구축할 필요가 있다. 수위·유량 관측소를 확충하여 도시하천 유역 전
반에 대한 실시간 예·경보 체계의 정확도를 향상시켜야 한다. 침수흔적도 및
홍수위험지도 등 홍수범람위험도를 체계적으로 구축하고, 이를 기반으로 홍수
위험 지역에 위치한 다중이용시설의 관리를 강화해야 한다. 더불어 단시간에
발생하는 도시홍수의 피해를 최소화하기 위한 신속한 피난체계를 구축하고,
교육, 훈련 및 홍보를 지속적으로 실시할 필요가 있다.

 

[목   차] 

Ⅰ. 서론 / 1
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ··············································································· 1
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 ··············································································· 3
가. 연구의 범위 ························································································ 3
나. 연구의 방법 ························································································ 4
Ⅱ. 도시홍수 관련 현황 / 5
1. 개요 ········································································································· 5
가. 도시홍수의 원인 ················································································· 5
나. 도시홍수 발생 현황 ··········································································· 6
2. 법령 현황 ······························································································· 11
가. 부처별 소관 업무 및 법령 현황 ······················································ 11
나. 입법 연혁 ························································································· 23
Ⅲ. 도시홍수 예방대책의 문제점 / 28
1. 부처별 대책 간의 연계성 부족 ····························································· 28
2. 도시지역 개발로 인한 불투수면 증가 ·················································· 30
3. 도시홍수 예방시설의 효용성 부족 ························································ 32
4. 도시홍수 대응 시스템 미비 ·································································· 34

Ⅳ. 해외 사례 / 37
1. 중국 ········································································································ 37
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 37
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 39
2. 일본 ········································································································ 41
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 41
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 43
3. 유럽 ········································································································ 45
가. 도시홍수 사례 ·················································································· 45
나. 도시홍수 예방대책 ··········································································· 46
4. 시사점 ···································································································· 48
Ⅴ. 입법 및 정책 개선 방안 / 49
1. 특정하천유역치수계획의 정비 ······························································· 49
2. 도시물순환 체계 개선 ··········································································· 51
3. 도시홍수 방어능력 구축 ········································································ 53
4. 도시홍수 대응 시스템 선진화 ······························································· 55
Ⅵ. 결론 / 57
참고문헌 / 61
부록 / 63
[부록 1] 특정도시하천유역 침수피해방지대책법(안) ······························· 63

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문


★2020년 하반기 경제정책방향.pdf
3.83MB

 

 

 

 정부는 6.1(월) 대통령 주재 제6차 비상경제회의를 개최하여 2020년 하반기 경제정책방향을 확정 · 발표하였습니다.

화, 2020/06/02- 04:04
8
0

 


2005-코로나19이후의 농업 농촌에 대한 도시민의 인식변화.pdf
0.45MB

요 약
현안분석 제73호(2020. 5. 8.)
코로나19 이후 농업·농촌에 대한 도시민의 인식과 수요 변화
이명기·순병민·우성휘

코로나19 이후 농업‧농촌이 중요하다는 인식 커져
• 전체 응답자 중 코로나19 이후 국민경제에서 농업이 차지하는 중요성이 높아졌다고 응답한 비중은 67.6%, 농업·농촌의
공익적 기능의 중요성이 높아졌다고 응답한 비중은 69.5%, 식량안보가 중요해졌다고 응답한 비중은 74.9%였음.

도시민의 귀농‧귀촌 의향이 증가하고 농축산물 안전성에 민감해져
• 코로나19 이후 귀농‧귀촌 의향이 증가했다는 응답 비중(20.3%)이 감소했다는 응답 비중(8.2%)보다 높은 것으로
조사되었으며, 코로나19 이후 농축산물 안전성을 ‘더 고려한다’는 응답 비중이 48.6%로 높게 나타났음.

수입산 농축산물에 비해 국산 농축산물 구매량이 증가하고 외식 횟수가 크게 줄어들어
• 코로나19 이후 국산 농축산물 구매량이 증가했다고 응답한 비중은 27.1%로 감소했다고 응답한 비중(14.1%)보다 높았던 반면, 수입산 농축산물 구매량이 증가했다고 응답한 비중은 7%로 감소했다고 응답한 비중(32.1%)보다 낮았음.

• 코로나19 이후 외식 횟수가 감소했다고 응답한 인원은 전체의 79.5%로 매우 높았고, 이들은 외식 횟수(석달 평균)가 평균 63.6% 감소했다고 답했음.
코로나19 이후 도시민들은 친환경 농산물 구매량을 늘린 반면 화훼류 구매량은 줄였다고 응답했고, 코로나19가 진정
혹은 종식되는 경우 연간 농촌관광 횟수를 전년에 비해 늘릴 예정으로 나타나
• 코로나19 이후 친환경 농산물 구매량이 증가했다고 응답한 비중은 21.2%로 감소했다고 응답한 비중(8.1%)보다 높았던 반면 꽃(절화) 구매량은 감소했다고 응답한 비중은 33.2%로 증가했다고 응답한 비중(6.0%)보다 높았음.
• 코로나19가 진정 혹은 종식되는 경우 본인의 연간 농촌관광 횟수가 증가할 것이라고 답변한 비중(44.5%)이 감소할 것이라고 답변한 비중(12.9%)보다 높았음.

수, 2020/05/27- 06:31
8
0

––코로나19의 전 세계적 확산으로 상당한 경제적 충격이 예상됨에 따라 우리나라를 포함한 각국은 종합적인 긴급지원
대책을 내놓고 있음. 이와 관련하여, 일차적 우선순위는 피해 사업장과 점포가 직원을 해고하거나 휴·폐업하지 않도록
고용유지보조금을 지급하고 손실을 부분적으로 보전하는 것과, 코로나19로 인해 실직, 휴·폐업한 피용자와 자영자에게
재기하기까지의 소득을 지원하는 것에 두어야 함.
––또한 감염병예방법, 사회재난 구호 관련 규정, 긴급복지지원법 상의 긴급지원 간 우선순위, 중복수급 가능 여부 등을
정리하고, 전달체계도 보강되어야 함. 재난이나 위기 상황에서 보건의료적·경제적·심리적 지원에 대한 정보에 쉽게 접근할
수 있도록 재난 관리 및 지원 통합 포털을 개설하는 방안도 검토할 필요가 있음.
––특히 외환위기와 금융위기를 전후로 자살이 크게 증가한 점을 감안하여 심리적 방역체계를 신속하게 정비하고 경제적
지원과의 연계를 강화해야 할 것임.

수, 2020/05/20- 04:49
8
0


D2002003-공공부분 일자리 통계-체크.hwp
2.05MB

공공부분의 범위에 대한 논쟁은 언제나 정부규모에 대한 가치판단을 전제로 한다. OECD에서도 한국의 공무원의 수 등 공공부분의 통계에 대한 지적을 계속하고 있다.

세금으로 인건비를 해결하는 사람을 공공부분으로 보는 다른 나라들과 자격으로서의 공무원만을 강조하는 한국에는 근본적인 인식의 차이가 존재하는 것이 현실이다. 이제 정부는 현정부들어 이러한 지적들을 일부 수용하여 공공부분이라는 통계분류로 좀더 적극적인  노력을 하고 있다. 

245만명이 정부가 인정하는 공공부분이다. 일단 준공무원은 포함한 셈이다. 하지만 여전히 일반 사병과, 복지기관 종사자 사립학교 교원 등 공공의 영역에 있는 많은 부분이 빠져있다.

 

나라살림연구소는 이후 공무원의 범위에 대한 분석과 함께 임금의 현황을 정확히 추산하고 방향과 가치에 대한 시사점을 제공할 예정이다.

화, 2020/02/11- 06:06
8
0