주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

지역

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

admin | 화, 2020/02/18- 03:00

 

 

G20/OECD가 BEPS의 일환으로 실시한 디지털화에 따른 경제분석과 영향평가에 따르면, 디지털세가 연간 미화 천억 달러의 세수를 늘릴 것이라고 한다. 

 

 


presentation-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-webcast-february-2020.pdf
0.42MB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OECD presents analysis showing significant impact of proposed international tax reforms

 

Watch the live webcast

13/02/2020 - New economic analysis shows that a proposed solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy under negotiation at the OECD would have a significant positive impact on global tax revenues.

The analysis, released today, puts the combined effect of the two-pillar solution under discussion at up to 4% of global corporate income tax (CIT) revenues, or USD 100 billion annually. The revenue gains are broadly similar across high, middle and low-income economies, as a share of corporate tax revenues.

The analysis was released just weeks after the international community reaffirmed its commitment to reach a consensus-based long-term solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy, and will continue working toward an agreement by the end of 2020, according to a Statement by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS.

The Inclusive Framework on BEPS, which brings together 137 countries and jurisdictions on an equal footing for multilateral negotiation of international tax rules, decided during its Jan. 29-30 meeting to move ahead with a two-pillar negotiation to address the tax challenges of digitalisation. 

Participants agreed to pursue the negotiation of new rules on where tax should be paid (“nexus” rules) and on what portion of profits they should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules), on the basis of a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One. The aim is to ensure that multinational enterprises (MNEs) conducting sustained and significant business in places where they may not have a physical presence can be taxed in such jurisdictions. They also decided to continue discussions on Pillar Two, which aims to address remaining base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) issues and ensure that international businesses pay a minimum level of tax.

The economic analysis and impact assessment of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals is being undertaken to inform key decisions on the design and parameters of the tax reform to be agreed by Inclusive Framework members as part of the negotiations underway at the OECD. The analysis covers data from more than 200 jurisdictions, including all members of the Inclusive Framework, and more than 27,000 MNE groups. Assumptions in the preliminary analysis are illustrative, and do not pre-judge decisions to be taken by the Inclusive Framework.

The analysis shows that the Pillar One reform - designed to re-allocate some taxing rights to market jurisdictions, regardless of physical presence - would also bring a small tax revenue gain for most jurisdictions. Under Pillar One, low and middle-income economies are expected to gain relatively more revenue than advanced economies, with investment hubs experiencing some loss in tax revenues. More than half of the profit re-allocated would come from 100 large MNE groups.

The analysis shows that Pillar Two could raise a significant amount of additional tax revenues. By reducing the tax rate differentials between jurisdictions, the reform is expected to lead to a significant reduction in profit shifting by MNEs. This will be important for developing economies as they tend to be more adversely affected by profit shifting than high-income economies.

The overall direct effect on investment costs is expected to be small in most countries, as the reforms target firms with high levels of profitability and low effective tax rates. The reforms would also reduce the influence of corporate taxes on investment location decisions. In addition, failure to reach a consensus-based solution would likely lead to further unilateral measures and greater uncertainty.

Further information on the latest Update on the Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment is available at: http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/webcast-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-february-2020.htm.

To watch a webcast on the analysis: https://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/6231/or/webcast_economic_analysis_and_impact_assessment.html.

The OECD’s work on the digitalisation of the economy is part of wider efforts to restore stability and increase certainty in the international tax system, address possible overlaps with existing rules and mitigate the risks of double taxation. 

The ongoing work will be presented in a new OECD Secretary General Tax Report during the next meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on 22-23 February.

For more information on the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, see: www.oecd.org/tax/beps/.

Media queries should be directed to Pascal Saint-Amans, Director of the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration (+33 1 45 24 91 08) or Lawrence Speer in the OECD Media Office (+33 1 4524 7970).

 

Working with over 100 countries, the OECD is a global policy forum that promotes policies to improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world.

 

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문


영농폐비닐 배출현황과 시사점 (국회입법조사처, 2020.10).pdf
2.02MB

 

배경

주요내용

- 연도별·재질별 영농폐비닐 발생현황(2014~2018년)
- 지역별·재질별 영농폐비닐 발생현황
- 연도별 영농폐비닐 수거량·재활용량과 재질별 재활용량
- 농가의 영농폐기물 소각 경험과 그 이유
- 농촌의 영농폐기물 적정처리를 위한 인프라와 공익직불제 준수사항

시사점

 

화, 2020/11/03- 21:06
0
0


식품자급률 현황과 과제 (국회입법조사처, 2020.10).pdf
1.46MB

 

배경

주요내용

- 연도별 곡물자급률 및 식량자급률 현황
- 최근 10년간 곡물별 식량자급률 추이
- 식품자급률 국제비교
- 2022년 식품자급률 목표대비 2018년 달성률
- 연도별 식품 생산량, 수입량, 감모량, 사료공급량, 식용공급량
- 연도별 곡류 외 식품자급률 현황

시사점

 

 

화, 2020/11/03- 21:18
0
0

↓보고서 전문↓

 

[원본] 서울시 에너지정책 개별사업의 효과산정 방법 (서울연구원).pdf

 

drive.google.com


[요약] 서울시 에너지정책 개별사업의 효과산정 방법 (서울연구원).pdf
1.28MB

 

서울연구원은 본고에서 에너지사업의 에너지 생산량이나 에너지 절감량을 평가함에 있어서 계절이나 월별 차이를 고려한 단기성과를 평가할 수 있도록 월별 원단위를 제시하고 설비준공연도의 성과평가 방법까지 제시하고자 하였다.

<목 차>

01 연구개요

02 신재생에너지 생산량 평가방법

03 에너지효율화사업 성과평가방법

04 결론

 

에너지정책 개별사업의 성과 측정할 때 준공시기 고려해 연간 생산·절감량 설정

신재생에너지 생산량 평가 시 월별 발전량·실제 사용기간 고려 

① 태양광발전(사업용)
1kW 태양광발전설비의 연간발전량은 1,358kWh(3.72kWh/kW/일)를 적용하도록 「신재생에너지 설비의 지원 등에 관한 지침」에 명시되어 있으나, 지역별 발전량은 제시되지 않았다. 태양광설비의 1kW당 단위발전량을 분석한 결과 서울시는 1일 평균 3.554kWh, 전국은 3.542kWh로 지침에 제시된 기준보다 낮게 나타났다. [표 1]에 나타낸 바와 같이 서울지역 5월의 발전량(4.695kWh/kW/일)은 12월 발전량(2.605 kWh/kW/일) 대비 80% 높게 나타났다.

② 수소연료전지발전
「신재생에너지 설비의 지원 등에 관한 지침」에는 연간 수소연료전지의 단위에너지 생산량을 9,392kWh/kW․yr(25.73kWh/kW․day)로 명시하고 있다. 열생산량과 전력생산량에 대한 구분이 없어 실질적인 에너지 생산량과 온실가스 감축량 평가에 적용할 수 없다. 전력거래소 자료를 분석한 결과 서울지역의 연료전지 단위발전량은 15.66MWh/MW/일로 전국 평균 (16.75MWh/MW/일)보다 낮다. 

③ 소수력발전
서울시 내에는 소수력발전 설비가 없어 경기도와 강원도 지역의 소수력발전량을 분석하여 단위발전량을 산정하였다. 연평균 9.1MWh/MW/일의 전력을 생산하며, 생산량이 가장 높은 달과 낮은 달은 4월과 1월로 각각 12.7MWh/MW/일, 5.0MWh/MW/일의 전력을 생산한다.

④ 바이오가스 열병합발전
서울시 바이오가스 열병합발전 설비의 단위발전량은 연평균 14.45MWh/MW/일로, 전국의 9.23MWh/MW/일보다 높은 수준이다. 월별 발전량은 5월이 18.81MWh/MW/일로 가장 높고 10월이 7.45MWh/MW/일로 가장 낮게 나타났다.

화, 2020/11/10- 21:48
0
0