주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

지역

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

admin | 화, 2020/02/18- 03:00

 

 

G20/OECD가 BEPS의 일환으로 실시한 디지털화에 따른 경제분석과 영향평가에 따르면, 디지털세가 연간 미화 천억 달러의 세수를 늘릴 것이라고 한다. 

 

 


presentation-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-webcast-february-2020.pdf
0.42MB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OECD presents analysis showing significant impact of proposed international tax reforms

 

Watch the live webcast

13/02/2020 - New economic analysis shows that a proposed solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy under negotiation at the OECD would have a significant positive impact on global tax revenues.

The analysis, released today, puts the combined effect of the two-pillar solution under discussion at up to 4% of global corporate income tax (CIT) revenues, or USD 100 billion annually. The revenue gains are broadly similar across high, middle and low-income economies, as a share of corporate tax revenues.

The analysis was released just weeks after the international community reaffirmed its commitment to reach a consensus-based long-term solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy, and will continue working toward an agreement by the end of 2020, according to a Statement by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS.

The Inclusive Framework on BEPS, which brings together 137 countries and jurisdictions on an equal footing for multilateral negotiation of international tax rules, decided during its Jan. 29-30 meeting to move ahead with a two-pillar negotiation to address the tax challenges of digitalisation. 

Participants agreed to pursue the negotiation of new rules on where tax should be paid (“nexus” rules) and on what portion of profits they should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules), on the basis of a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One. The aim is to ensure that multinational enterprises (MNEs) conducting sustained and significant business in places where they may not have a physical presence can be taxed in such jurisdictions. They also decided to continue discussions on Pillar Two, which aims to address remaining base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) issues and ensure that international businesses pay a minimum level of tax.

The economic analysis and impact assessment of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals is being undertaken to inform key decisions on the design and parameters of the tax reform to be agreed by Inclusive Framework members as part of the negotiations underway at the OECD. The analysis covers data from more than 200 jurisdictions, including all members of the Inclusive Framework, and more than 27,000 MNE groups. Assumptions in the preliminary analysis are illustrative, and do not pre-judge decisions to be taken by the Inclusive Framework.

The analysis shows that the Pillar One reform - designed to re-allocate some taxing rights to market jurisdictions, regardless of physical presence - would also bring a small tax revenue gain for most jurisdictions. Under Pillar One, low and middle-income economies are expected to gain relatively more revenue than advanced economies, with investment hubs experiencing some loss in tax revenues. More than half of the profit re-allocated would come from 100 large MNE groups.

The analysis shows that Pillar Two could raise a significant amount of additional tax revenues. By reducing the tax rate differentials between jurisdictions, the reform is expected to lead to a significant reduction in profit shifting by MNEs. This will be important for developing economies as they tend to be more adversely affected by profit shifting than high-income economies.

The overall direct effect on investment costs is expected to be small in most countries, as the reforms target firms with high levels of profitability and low effective tax rates. The reforms would also reduce the influence of corporate taxes on investment location decisions. In addition, failure to reach a consensus-based solution would likely lead to further unilateral measures and greater uncertainty.

Further information on the latest Update on the Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment is available at: http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/webcast-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-february-2020.htm.

To watch a webcast on the analysis: https://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/6231/or/webcast_economic_analysis_and_impact_assessment.html.

The OECD’s work on the digitalisation of the economy is part of wider efforts to restore stability and increase certainty in the international tax system, address possible overlaps with existing rules and mitigate the risks of double taxation. 

The ongoing work will be presented in a new OECD Secretary General Tax Report during the next meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on 22-23 February.

For more information on the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, see: www.oecd.org/tax/beps/.

Media queries should be directed to Pascal Saint-Amans, Director of the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration (+33 1 45 24 91 08) or Lawrence Speer in the OECD Media Office (+33 1 4524 7970).

 

Working with over 100 countries, the OECD is a global policy forum that promotes policies to improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world.

 

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문


일본의 과학기술혁신 관련 법률 개정 동향과 시사점 (국회입법조사처).pdf
1.14MB

□ 과학기술정책은 과거 연구개발을 통한 과학기술의 공급에 초점을 두었던 것과 달리 과학기술의 활용을 더욱 강조하는 등 정책의 대상 범위가 확대되는 추세임

o 과학기술의 공급뿐만 아니라 이전·사업화가 더욱 강조되고 있고, 자연과학과 인문·사회과학 간의 융합의 필요성이 증대되는 추세이며, 연구개발이 필요한 분야가 늘어남에 따라 부처별로 이루어지는 연구개발에 대한 컨트롤타워의 중요성이 높아지고 있음

□ 일본 내각부는 2020년 3월「과학기술기본법 등의 일부를 개정하는 법률안」을 국회에 제출했으며, 이 법률안은 2020년 6월 공포되어 2021년 4월부터 시행될 예정임

o「과학기술기본법」의 제명을「과학기술혁신기본법」으로 하고, 이 법에 따른 과학기술기본계획을 과학기술혁신기본계획으로 변경하는 등 이 법의 진흥 대상을 과학기술에서 과학기술혁신으로 확장함

o 기존「과학기술기본법」은 과학기술의 범위에서 ‘인문과학에만 관계되는 과학기술’은 제외했으나,「과학기술혁신기본법」은 그 범위를 ‘인문과학에만 관계되는 과학기술’까지 확장했으며,「과학기술혁신 창출의 활성화에 관한 법률」 등 주요 유관 법률도 함께 개정됨

o「내각부 설치법」에는 내각부가 과학기술정책을 총괄한다는 점, 내각부에 ‘종합과학기술혁신회의’를 설치한다는 점이 규정되어 있는데, 이번 개정에서는 내각부에 ‘과학기술혁신추진사무국’을 설치한다는 조항이 신설됨

□ 우리나라「과학기술기본법」에는 혁신의 개념이 명확하게 포함되어 있지 않고, 과학기술 종합조정 사무조직이 부처에 소속되어 있는데, 향후 발전방향 논의에서 일본의 입법사례도 참고할 필요가 있음


1. 법률 개정 배경과 경과

2. 개정 법률의 주요 내용

3. 우리나라 관련 법률과 시사점

화, 2020/10/13- 19:42
0
0


고령층 가구의 저축률 상승 현상 논의 (보험연구원, 2020.10).pdf
0.39MB

 

< 차 례 >

요 약

1. 검토배경

2. 연령별 저축률의 변화

3. 세대별 저축률의 변화

4. 시사점

 

- 요 약 -

월, 2020/10/26- 20:56
0
0