주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

지역

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy (OECD)

admin | 화, 2020/02/18- 03:00

 

 

G20/OECD가 BEPS의 일환으로 실시한 디지털화에 따른 경제분석과 영향평가에 따르면, 디지털세가 연간 미화 천억 달러의 세수를 늘릴 것이라고 한다. 

 

 


presentation-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-webcast-february-2020.pdf
0.42MB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OECD presents analysis showing significant impact of proposed international tax reforms

 

Watch the live webcast

13/02/2020 - New economic analysis shows that a proposed solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy under negotiation at the OECD would have a significant positive impact on global tax revenues.

The analysis, released today, puts the combined effect of the two-pillar solution under discussion at up to 4% of global corporate income tax (CIT) revenues, or USD 100 billion annually. The revenue gains are broadly similar across high, middle and low-income economies, as a share of corporate tax revenues.

The analysis was released just weeks after the international community reaffirmed its commitment to reach a consensus-based long-term solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy, and will continue working toward an agreement by the end of 2020, according to a Statement by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS.

The Inclusive Framework on BEPS, which brings together 137 countries and jurisdictions on an equal footing for multilateral negotiation of international tax rules, decided during its Jan. 29-30 meeting to move ahead with a two-pillar negotiation to address the tax challenges of digitalisation. 

Participants agreed to pursue the negotiation of new rules on where tax should be paid (“nexus” rules) and on what portion of profits they should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules), on the basis of a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One. The aim is to ensure that multinational enterprises (MNEs) conducting sustained and significant business in places where they may not have a physical presence can be taxed in such jurisdictions. They also decided to continue discussions on Pillar Two, which aims to address remaining base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) issues and ensure that international businesses pay a minimum level of tax.

The economic analysis and impact assessment of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals is being undertaken to inform key decisions on the design and parameters of the tax reform to be agreed by Inclusive Framework members as part of the negotiations underway at the OECD. The analysis covers data from more than 200 jurisdictions, including all members of the Inclusive Framework, and more than 27,000 MNE groups. Assumptions in the preliminary analysis are illustrative, and do not pre-judge decisions to be taken by the Inclusive Framework.

The analysis shows that the Pillar One reform - designed to re-allocate some taxing rights to market jurisdictions, regardless of physical presence - would also bring a small tax revenue gain for most jurisdictions. Under Pillar One, low and middle-income economies are expected to gain relatively more revenue than advanced economies, with investment hubs experiencing some loss in tax revenues. More than half of the profit re-allocated would come from 100 large MNE groups.

The analysis shows that Pillar Two could raise a significant amount of additional tax revenues. By reducing the tax rate differentials between jurisdictions, the reform is expected to lead to a significant reduction in profit shifting by MNEs. This will be important for developing economies as they tend to be more adversely affected by profit shifting than high-income economies.

The overall direct effect on investment costs is expected to be small in most countries, as the reforms target firms with high levels of profitability and low effective tax rates. The reforms would also reduce the influence of corporate taxes on investment location decisions. In addition, failure to reach a consensus-based solution would likely lead to further unilateral measures and greater uncertainty.

Further information on the latest Update on the Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment is available at: http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/webcast-economic-analysis-impact-assessment-february-2020.htm.

To watch a webcast on the analysis: https://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/6231/or/webcast_economic_analysis_and_impact_assessment.html.

The OECD’s work on the digitalisation of the economy is part of wider efforts to restore stability and increase certainty in the international tax system, address possible overlaps with existing rules and mitigate the risks of double taxation. 

The ongoing work will be presented in a new OECD Secretary General Tax Report during the next meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on 22-23 February.

For more information on the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, see: www.oecd.org/tax/beps/.

Media queries should be directed to Pascal Saint-Amans, Director of the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration (+33 1 45 24 91 08) or Lawrence Speer in the OECD Media Office (+33 1 4524 7970).

 

Working with over 100 countries, the OECD is a global policy forum that promotes policies to improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world.

 

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문

2차 재난지원금, 할 것인가 말 것인가? (국회 토론회 자료집) 

 

200730_재난지원금토론회_2차재난지원금할것인가말것인가.pdf

 

drive.google.com

 

목, 2020/08/06- 00:48
0
0


환경정의 관점에서 제천시 자원관리센터 사례 분석.pdf
0.34MB

오늘날 혐오시설을 대하는 분위기가 이전과는 달라진 상황이다. 주민들의 참여나 정보공개 없
이 독단적으로 사업을 추진할 수 없고 혐오시설이지만 반드시 입지해야 할 필요성이 있을 때에는
추진 전부터 그에 걸맞은 접근을 하고 있기 때문이다. 즉, 부담과 이득의 공정한 처우(fair
treatment), 의미있는 참여(meaningful involvement)가 강조되고 있다.
이에 따라 본 연구는 제천시 자원관리센터의 입지선정 과정부터 현재까지의 상황에 대해 환경
정의 이론을 적용하여 분석하였다. 연구를 통해 첫째, 제천시는 사업시작 전부터 관련 방안들을
제시하여 환경적 부담과 이익의 형평한 분배가 이루어질 수 있도록 유도하였음을 알 수 있었다.
둘째, 사업 준비부터 준공까지 전 차원・전 과정에 주민들의 참여를 유도하고, 책임전담팀을 구성
하여 이들이 책임지고 사업을 추진해가도록 도모하였으며, 모든 정보를 공개・공유함으로 투명성
확보 및 정보비대칭 문제를 해소하였다. 이에 절차적 정의가 실현될 수 있었다. 셋째, 자원관리센
터 준공 이후에도 다양한 노력들을 시행하여 시 차원에는 예산절감 효과를, 환경측면에는 환경오

염을 줄여 실질적 정의를 실현시켰음을 알 수 있었다. 이는 환경부하의 감소는 물론 자원이 순환
되게 만들어 생태적 정의 달성에도 영향을 주었다.
결국 환경정의 네 가지 요인은 상호 연결되어 있음을 알 수 있었고, 정부가 공정한 처우, 의미
있는 참여를 바탕으로 주민들을 설득한다면 혐오시설이라 할지라도 주민들의 저항없이 입지할 수
있음을 알 수 있었다.

화, 2020/08/11- 22:43
0
0


(이슈와논점+1738호-20200806)수돗물+유충+발생현황과+개선과제.pdf
0.46MB

최근 인천광역시의 수돗물에서 유충이 연이어 발생되고 있어 국민들의 수돗물에 대한 불신이 커지고
있다. 이의 해결을 위해서는 ①숙련된 기술인력의 확보, ②수돗물 사고에 대한 중앙과 지방간 소통체계
구축, ③수돗물 품질관리를 위한 인증체계와 가이드라인 마련이 시급하다.

화, 2020/08/11- 22:44
0
0


4대_공적연금_장기_재정전망.pdf
3.86MB


[NABO브리핑제90호]_4대_공적연금_장기_재정전망.pdf
0.96MB

4대 공적연금의 재정수지는 불변가격 기준으로 2020년 0.6조원 흑자(GDP대비 0.02%)
를 보이고, 2090년 226.7조원 적자(GDP대비 –5.48%)가 예상
● (국민연금) 재정수지가 2039년에 흑자에서 적자로 전환된 후, 2090년에 178조원까지 적자
가 증가하고, 적립금은 2055년에 소진될 것으로 전망
● (공무원연금) 재정수지 적자가 2020년 2.1조원(GDP대비 0.11%)에서 2090년 32.1조원
(GDP대비 0.78%)로 적자 폭이 커질 것으로 전망
● (사학연금) 재정수지가 2033년에 흑자에서 적자로 전환된 후, 2090년에 9.9조원(GDP대비
0.25%)까지 적자가 증가하고, 적립금은 2048년에 소진될 것으로 전망
● (군인연금) 재정수지 적자가 2020년 1.7조원(GDP대비 0.10%)에서 2090년 6.7조원(GDP대
비 0.16%)로 그 규모가 커질 것으로 전망

화, 2020/08/11- 22:46
0
0


재정활동의_성과관리체계_평가.pdf
2.74MB


[NABO브리핑제89호]_재정활동의_성과관리체계_평가.pdf
1.43MB

재정활동의 성과관리체계 평가
예산분석실 경제산업사업평가과
「국가재정법」은 성과중심의 재정운용을 위하여 각 중앙관서의 장 등이 ‘재정활동의
성과관리체계’를 구축하도록 규정하고 있다.
그러나 현행 ‘재정활동의 성과관리체계’는 전체 예산이 아닌 주요사업비 중심의
재정사업 예산으로 한정되어, 예산총액 대비 24.5%에 대해서만 평가 및 성과관리가
이루어지고 있다. 또한 ‘재정활동의 성과관리체계’가 재정사업과 정책사업으로
구분되어 개별적으로 운영됨에 따라, 성과관리의 비효율이 발생하고 있다.
이를 개선하기 위해서는 인건비와 기본경비로 추진되는 정책사업들도 ‘재정활동의
성과관리체계’에 포함시킴으로써, 「정부업무평가 기본법」에서 규정한 바에 따라
통합적 성과관리체계를 구축할 필요가 있다.

화, 2020/08/11- 22:57
0
0

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅰ] 2019회계연도 결산 총괄분석 (국회예산정책처)

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅱ] 2019회계연도 결산 위원회별 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

 

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅲ] 2019회계연도 공공기관 결산 분석 보고서

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 Ⅳ] 2018회계연도 결산 국회 시정요구사항에 대한 정부 조치결과 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

[결산분석시리즈 V] 2019회계연도 성인지 결산서 분석

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

 

화, 2020/08/11- 23:24
0
0

 

한국경제의 구조변화와 대응전략 (국회예산정책처)

www.nabo.go.kr" data-og-source-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-url="https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19…" data-og-image="">

 

분석보고서 > 전체

 

www.nabo.go.kr

< 차 례 >

한국경제의 구조변화와 대응전략(총론)

 

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 경제구조 변화 및 대응 필요성
Ⅲ. 인구구조 변화와 대응전략
Ⅳ. 산업구조 변화와 대응전략
Ⅴ. 기후변화와 대응전략
Ⅵ. 구조변화에 대응한 재정전략

 

Ⅰ. 경제구조 변화에 대응한 지속성장 과제

 

Ⅰ. 분석 목적
Ⅱ. 한국경제 구조변화
Ⅲ. 한국경제 구조변화의 영향
Ⅳ. 한국경제 지속성장 과제

 

Ⅱ. 지속가능성장을 위한 인구구조 변화

 

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 인구구조 변화 현황
Ⅲ. 인구구조 변화에 따른 문제점
Ⅳ. 주요국의 인구구조변화 대응전략 사례
Ⅴ. 인구구조 변화 대응 전략

 

Ⅲ. 지속성장을 위한 산업구조변화 대응전략

 

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 산업구조 변화
Ⅲ. 산업구조변화가 한국경제에 미치는 영향
Ⅳ. 산업구조변화 대응전략

 

Ⅳ. 지속성장을 위한 기후변화 대응전략

 

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기후변화 대응의 필요성 및 정책 현황
Ⅲ. 기후변화 대응과 경제성장
Ⅳ. 우리나라 기후변화 대응 전략의 성과 및 문제점
Ⅴ. 지속성장을 위한 기후변화 대응 전략

 

Ⅴ. 성장여건 변화 대응 재정 전략

 

Ⅰ. 분석 개요
Ⅱ. 성장여건 변화 대응 거시 재정전략
Ⅲ. 인구구조변화 대응 재정전략 : 복지·고용분야를 중심으로
Ⅳ. 산업구조변화 대응 재정전략
Ⅴ. 기후변화 대응 재정전략 : 에너지분야를 중심으로
Ⅵ. 결 론

화, 2020/08/11- 23:29
0
0

 


생활물류 실태와 전망.pdf
0.44MB


생활물류산업(택배.배달대행 및 이륜차 배송)내 특수고용 노동의 특징과 정책 대안.pdf
0.42MB

택배서비스, 배달플랫폼을 이용한 배달대행서비스 등은 비접촉 경제활동의 증가, 온라인소비의 증가, 플랫폼의 다양화와 발달 등으로 향후에도 지속적으로 증가한 것 으로 예상되고 있다.

 

생활물류 실태와 전망(한국교통연구원)

 

 

수, 2020/08/12- 00:10
0
0