<목 차>

1. 사안의 개요 ·································································································· 1
가. 철도 공사·노조 관련 사건의 흐름 ····························································· 1
나. SR 법인 설립 ···························································································· 2
다. 철도노조 2009년 파업 사건 ··································································· 3
라. KTX 승무원 불법파견 사건 ···································································· 4
2. 공개된 문건의 내용 ···················································································· 6
가. 상고법원 입법 추진을 위한 BH 설득방안 [80] ···································· 6
나. 상고법원의 성공적 입법추진을 위한 BH와의 효과적 협상추진 전략 [82] ··········· 8
3. 특조단 조사보고서 내용 ··········································································· 10
가. 조사내용의 기재 ······················································································ 10
나. 특조단의 평가 ·························································································· 10
4. 사법농단의 실태 및 평가 ·········································································· 11
가. 군사작전을 방불케 한 수서고속철도 법인의 졸속 설립 ······················· 12
나. 전원합의체 판결에 반하는 철도파업 업무방해죄 처벌 ························· 12
다. 철도 민영화에 발맞춘 KTX 승무원 판결 ············································· 13
5. 특조단 조사의 한계 및 수사의 필요성 ···················································· 14
가. ‘참고자료’ 판단의 문제점 ········································································ 14
나. 문건의 구체적 작성·활용 경위 조사 필요성 ·········································· 15
다. 재판관계자에 대한 영향 조사 필요성 ···················································· 15
[보론] KTX 승무원 판결에 대한 2018. 6. 20.자 대법관 보도자료에
대한 반박 ····························································································· 17