주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

[Column] The Struggles of the Tumandok and Ilonggos Against the Jalaur Mega Dam

지역

[Column] The Struggles of the Tumandok and Ilonggos Against the Jalaur Mega Dam

익명 (미확인) | 화, 2016/08/02- 23:19

LAND IS LIFE

The Struggles of the Tumandok and Ilonggos Against the Jalaur Mega Dam

 

John Ian S. Alenciaga Secretariat, Jalaur River for the People’s Movement (JRPM)

 

PANAY Island, Philippines – The indigenous people’s Tumandok and the Ilonggo community in the island of Panay, Philippines are faced with a horrendous project of the Philippine government, the Jalaur River Multipurpose Project Phase II (JRMP2) or the Jalaur mega dam.

 

The Jalaur mega dam project is supposed to have been finished by 2016, before President Aquino ended his term. But because of the opposition from both local and international, the mega dam is yet to be constructed this year’s 3rd quarter.

 

Touted to provide irrigation for rice production, potable water in the city and nearby towns, and to augment power supply in the region, the project is hounded by issues of dislocation, threats and destruction of the environment and loss of lives.

 

The Tumandoks

 

One of the directly impacted communities are those of the Tumandok people, also known as Panay Bukidnon in academic circles, of Central Panay. They remain the largest indigenous people’s group with a population of 94,000 in the municipalities of Calinog, Janiuay, and Lambunao (Iloilo province) and Tapaz and Jamindan (Capiz province) with their ancestral domain and communities located along and within the Jalaur and Pan-ay Rivers.

 

According to the World Commission on Dams, “large dams have had serious impacts on the lives, livelihoods, cultures and spiritual existence of indigenous and tribal peoples.”

 

The Tumandok people have started opposing the project in October 2011 during their 8th General Assembly. More than thousand Tumandok people from various upland villages and towns of Iloilo and Capiz provinces passed a resolution opposing the Jalaur mega dam project because it will destroy their communities, livelihoods and the environment, resulting to cultural ethnocide of their tribe.

 

The Jalaur mega dam will directly and indirectly affect 16 upland villages of Calinog town, totally submerging three villages namely Garangan, Masaroy and Agcalaga. In the most recent government data, about 17,000 indigenous peoples will be affected.

 

“Our farms will be submerged. Our livelihoods and houses will be destroyed. What will happen to us? We are being treated as foreign from our own native lands,” said Romeo Castor, whose land will host the site of the 40-meter high afterbay dam.

 

ⓒ JRPM

 

Human rights violations

 

Two of the three dams, the Jalaur main reservoir and the afterbay, are located within the ancestral domain majorly owned by the Castor clan. Romeo’s brother Nestor, has already lost almost one hectare of his lands due to road construction going to the main dam site. He was only paid PHP1,800.00 (US$38) for the damages to his coffee plants and fruit-bearing trees, but during the court trial where he was a witness, the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) presented a document showing that he received PHP180,000.00 (US$3817).

 

The Tumandok people also faced various harassments, threats and intimidations by the municipal and provincial LGUs and proponents of the project. They were offered bribes to sign documents in favor of the project or face expropriation cases before the court for continuing to oppose the mega dam. Their lives are also in danger as more and more military and police forces are deployed in the area to suppress their organizing and education campaign.

 

The project and the presence of the military and police forces was faced by opposition not only from the locals but also by the New People’s Army (NPA). Two incidents of sniping by the NPAs were recorded against government troops stationed to guard the dam area. Government forces suffered casualty from the two separate incidents.


Deception and breaking protocols

 

A large project like the Jalaur mega dam, funded through the Official Development Assistance (ODA) of South Korea, did not observe and follow local and international laws and even violated these laws.

 

The Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) process, an international (United Nation Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007) and local (Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, 1997) guideline in informing and getting the consent of the Tumandoks was deliberately violated by the NIA and the National Commission of Indigenous Peoples (NCIP).

 

On November 2011, the NIA already submitted its final feasibility study to The Export-Import Bank of Korea (Korea Eximbank) but only conducted the FPIC process on the feasibility study among the affected communities on January until May of 2012.

 

The process was rigged to favor the proponents.

 

There was no “free” consent because reliable information from affected communities revealed that the NIA engaged in “giving incentives” thru menial job hiring of people who resist or are reluctant to give consent to the project. There was no “prior” consultations that happened because the final feasibility study was already submitted before the FPIC process was conducted. Neither was the consent “informed” because the NIA discussed only the supposed advantages of the project but kept from the people many information about the dangers and negative impacts, such as the existence of the active West Panay fault and that several communities will be submerged in water.

 

Even in the feasibility study report, the NIA lied about the existence of an active West Panay fault line and dismissed that “these faults are inactive and have no vestiges of movement.” This runs contrary to the 1948 Lady Caycay earthquake triggered by the active fault that caused widespread damages to 55 Panay churches.

 

People from the downstream areas of the Jalaur River were not also consulted about this project. In August 2014, Korean guests from Gong Gam Human Rights Law Foundation, visited the victims for the first time to document the implementation process of the project. One of their key-informant interviewee was the mayor of Dueñas town where they learned that local government units (LGU) were not consulted and that it was only in August 2014 that the provincial government gathered the LGU representatives to present the project.

 

Desecrated burial grounds and sacred sites


In the Tumandok area, burial grounds and sacred sites will be desecrated by the project, according to a research conducted by University of the Philippines Visayas graduates Mar Anthony Balani and Jude Mangilog.

 

The study, entitled “Necropolitics: Panay’s Tumandok Burial Grounds and the Jalaur Multipurpose Project Phase II (JRMP II)”, identified 5 Tumandok burial grounds and 1 sacred site in Calinog, Iloilo that will be destroyed to facilitate the construction of the Jalaur mega dam and access roads.

 

“The destruction of our burial grounds violates our cultural practices. Burial grounds represent the continuity and tradition of our family. These burial grounds are remembrance of our respect to our dead family relatives and ancestors,” one of the Tumandok key informants said in local dialect.

 

The Tumandok people was stopped to use their burial grounds during the American colonization period due to hygiene concerns. Since then, they would visit and held rituals on these sites as respect for their ancestors and the belief that their spirits dwell in these areas.

 

“We respect our dead. Our dead will condemn us that we agreed that their resting places will be desecrated. How painful it is to know that they’re dead already but they will be drowned by water. It is very painful for us Tumandok because our dead is not respected,” said another key informant in local dialect.

 

ⓒ JRPM

 

Struggles and challenges ahead


The Jalaur River for the People’s Movement (JRPM) was launched in March 2013 to consolidate efforts of the Tumandok and the downstream communities in their struggle against the mega dam project. JRPM also provides linkages to national and international organizations to strengthen solidarity and support for the stakeholders.

 

The continuing struggle since 2011 until today led to the delay of the construction of the dam. This victory is also shared with the national and international organizations, especially in South Korea (Gong Gam, KHIS, KTNZ Watch, Center for Green ODA, and now the PSPD) for without them, our efforts in the local and national level would not reach the Koexim bank and the South Korean people.

 

We reiterate our opposition because of the economic, social and environmental threats the dam would bring us. More than a million Ilonggos in the downstream communities would be inundated once the dam would release million cubic meters of water during heavy rainfalls as experienced by most communities in Metro Manila with large dams.

The Filipino people shall suffer the debt incurred from the loan (PHP8.92B and the additional PHP500M interest rate) only for the private institutions to benefit from the project after construction. Human rights violations would also continue to escalate once the dam has already started construction.

 

The recently concluded International Solidarity Mission (ISM) on July 16-18 provides broader support from various local, national and international individuals and organizations to strengthen our resolve in opposing the project.

 

Our calls:


1. We call on the Philippine government, its agencies and the Armed Forces of the Philippines to respect the Tumandok people’s rights to their ancestral domain and their processes of decision-making. The Tumandok people must be able to make informed decisions freely, without coercion, bribery and promises from the government, its agencies, and the military. A genuine FPIC process must be observed. 


2. We call for the stop of the militarization in the countryside, the pull-out of state security forces, including the Armed Forces of the Philippines, the Philippine National Police's Regional Mobile Group and Special Action Forces, and paramilitary groups from IP communities, and the investigation of human rights violations that were committed to coerce the IPs into consenting to the JRMP II.


3. We moreover call on the Philippine government to carry out the prompt indemnification of IPs and other victims for their properties damaged in the course of the implementation of the JRMP II.


4. We also call on the Duterte administration to review all development projects, including mega-dams and reforestation programs, intended to be implemented in the Tumandok people’s ancestral domain and to end projects which desacralize the Tumandok people’s cultural identity and violate their rights.  


5.  And we call on the South Korean Government, the loan-provider for the JRMP II, to deeply evaluate the issues that were raised by the IP communities and other stakeholders and to take necessary actions to address these concerns, including withholding of funds unless these concerns are properly addressed.

 

Our recommendations:


1. We recommend that an independent study on the feasibility of the proposed Jalaur River Dam be done in order to assess the proposed dam’s structural integrity, its impacts on the ecosystems along the Jalaur River, its socio-economic impacts on the IP communities that will be directly and indirectly affected by the dam including the downstream communities.


2. We also recommend that an exhaustive and comprehensive assessment be made on options and alternatives to the mega-dam. Of particular interest would be to assess the feasibility of small and micro-dams that are less hazardous and can still provide irrigation water to farming communities. Another option would be the rehabilitation of existing irrigation systems.


3. We further recommend that proposed dam projects in Jalaur and in Pan-ay rivers comply with the guidelines in the final report of the World Commission on Dams in 2000; that the process of free, prior and informed consent be strictly observed; and that international guidelines and safeguards on dam-building and projects related to ODA be followed as well.

 

Finally, we call on the help of the South Korean people to pressure the South Korean Government, and the Koexim Bank to heed the call of the victims and various stakeholders already and to be affected by the mega dam project.

 

The South Korean people’s money is better with other projects other than the mega dam that will endanger the lives, livelihood and future of the Tumandok people, the Ilonggos and the entire Filipino nation. 
 

시민들의 의견

댓글 달기

Plain text

  • 웹 페이지 주소 및 이메일 주소는 자동으로 링크로 전환됩니다.
  • 줄과 단락은 자동으로 분리됩니다.
  • 사용할 수 있는 HTML 태그: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
이미지
무제한 수의 파일을 이 필드에 업로드할 수 있습니다.
50 MB 한계입니다.
허용된 유형: png gif jpg jpeg.
Enter the YouTube URL. Valid URL formats include: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SqBdS0XkV4 and http://youtu.be/1SqBdS0XkV4.
CAPTCHA
스펨 사용자 차단 질문

설계변경과 조기 담수로 인한 라오스 댐 사고 가능성 규명되어야

SK건설의 이윤 추구와 수출입은행의 무리한 계약이 참사 불러왔다는 의혹 명백히 밝혀져야

 

지난 7월 23일 라오스에서 발생한 세피안·세남노이 댐 사고 관련하여 기획재정위원회 국정감사에서 더불어민주당 김경협 의원은 사고원인이 SK건설의 이윤 추구를 위한 과도한 설계 변경과 무리한 공사 기간 단축 때문이라는 의혹을 제기했다. 한국수출입은행도 라오스 정부와 차관 계약 8,080만 달러를 맺으며 조기 담수 보너스 480만 달러를 조건부로 제공하는 등 사실상 공기 단축을 부추기는 계약을 맺은 것으로 알려졌다. 사고 직후 SK건설과 한국 서부발전은 사고원인을 각각 다르게 발표하며 책임 회피에 급급했으며, 라오스 댐 사고 원인은 아직까지 정확히 밝혀지지 않고 있다. 지금이라도 늦지 않았다. 정부는 이번 참사의 원인을 둘러싼 의혹에 대해 명백히 밝히고 책임 있는 조치를 취해야 한다.

 

김경협 의원실에 따르면, SK건설은 공사를 예정보다 7개월 늦은 2013년 11월에 시작했음에도 불구하고 조기 담수는 예정대로 시작했고, 담수 기간도 6개월에서 4개월로 앞당겼다. 조기 담수 보너스 2천만 달러를 확보하기 위해 공사 기간을 단축했다는 것이다. 이윤을 남기기 위한 설계 변경 의혹도 제기되었다. 라오스 댐 공사 과정에서 보조댐 높이가 기본 설계보다 평균 6.5m가량 낮아졌는데, 이는 비용 절감을 위한 설계 변경이라는 것이다. 실제 SK 문건에는 ‘1,900만 달러 추가이익 확보를 위한 V/E(설계변경) 실시’ 등이 집중 거론되어 있다. 이러한 공사 기간 단축과 조기 담수 등으로 SK건설이 부실시공을 자초했다는 의혹은 사고 직후부터 제기되어왔던 문제이다. 그러나 SK건설은 기본 설계와 실시 설계 및 시공내용을 확인할 수 있는 자료를 ‘기밀’이라는 이유로 의원실에도 공개하지 않고 있다. 사고 직후 SK건설의 ‘공사 기간 단축’과 ‘조기 담수 보너스를 지급받았다’는 내용의 기사들이 삭제되는 일이 발생하기도 했다. 

 

문제는 이뿐만이 아니다. 라오스 세피안·세남노이 댐 사업은 「2015년 국제개발협력 종합시행계획」에 없던 것으로 당연히 관련 예산은 책정되지 않았다. 이에 기재부는 2015년 5월 자체적으로 4건의 개도국 차관 지원방침을 결정했고, 같은해 12월에 서둘러 라오스 댐 사업에 5,810만 달러(687억 원)을 지급했다. 국회 예산 심사 절차도 거치지 않은 것이다. 한국 수출입은행이 조기 담수 보너스를 지급하는 내용의 차관 계약을 맺은 것 역시 기업의 이윤 보장을 위한 것으로 빈곤 퇴치와 인도주의 실현이라는 공적개발원조(ODA)의 기본 취지에 어긋난다. 이러한 계약과 무리한 공사 기간 단축이 댐의 안전성에 영향을 미쳤을 가능성이 높지만, 정부는 댐 안정성은 물론 해당 사업이 대외경제협력기금(EDCF) 세이프가드를 제대로 이행하는 것인지, 비자발적 이주에 대한 대책을 제대로 마련했는지 등은 면밀히 검토하지 않고 계약을 체결했다.

 

이번 참사는 기업이 사회적 책임과 기업윤리를 무시한 채 수익에만 몰두하여 사업을 추진한다면 협력대상국의 빈곤을 해소하고 발전에 기여하겠다는 개발협력 사업의 목적에 반할 수 있다는 사실을 보여준다. 이를 방지하기 위한 정부의 책무를 무시하고 기업의 이윤을 보장해주려 할 경우도 마찬가지다. 이미 시민사회는 지역 사회의 환경을 파괴하고 주민들의 삶에 해를 끼칠 수 있는 이러한 개발협력 사업에 대해 깊은 우려를 제기해왔다. 지금이라도 정부는 라오스 댐 사고가 SK건설의 과도한 이윤 추구를 위해 무리하게 설계를 변경하거나 공사 기간을 단축하여 발생한 것은 아닌지, 댐 공사 과정에서 또 다른 위험 요인은 없었는지 등을 명확히 밝혀야 한다. 한국의 개발협력 사업으로 인해 불행한 사고가 발생하는 일이 없도록 하려면, 라오스 댐 참사에 대한 진상규명과 책임추궁은 필수적이다. 

 

논평 [원문보기/다운로드]

수, 2018/10/17- 09:33
57
0